Below is an essay from last year which looks at what we mean by Spirituality and which I will be reflecting on tomorrow in Class "Spirituality for today".
Tomorrow I will be looking at Spirituality through the Lens
Background
Ever since I was young child, the word mission kept popping up, mainly thanks to the work of Church Mission Society Ireland (CMSI) with their Lenten Sunday School projects and their “Mission Partners” who sent their prayer requests back from their foreign postings overseas. On my journey of faith I have managed to cross paths with many such people, people who have been called to “go” to leave their known and go to the unknown for the sake of the gospel. When I have met these individuals there has been something remarkably different about them. The difference hasn’t been them floating off on some “out there, spiritual high” but a remarkably grounded sensible reliance upon God and the shalom which could only come from a relationship with the God of mission who sent them there in the first place.
This essay will take the reader on a journey as we discover some of the principles which underlie such “Lives lived towards God[1]” and make the application for here and now. The book which will inform this piece of work is mission-shaped Spirituality by Susan Hope. It takes what I have witnessed in the mission partners lives overseas and applies the principles to Church Leadership in the Anglican Communion at home, which has an impact on the lives we as ordinands live now and as clergy in the future.
‘God’s missionary purposes are cosmic in scope, concerned with the restoration of all things, the establish of shalom, the renewal of creation and the coming of the kingdom as well as the redemption of fallen humanity and the building of the church.’[2]
As we take the enormity of this task on board, this mission is too great to even consider, however as believers this is the calling we have been invited and commissioned to participate in. The question we are considering within this essay is what do we need to put in place in our own lives in order that we can even consider living a life which is all about this mission?
When one looks around the church, which is called to share the message of God’s love, of his passion for humanity, it is common to see leaders who are caught up with the daily business of parish, diocesan committees, house call to house call and generally running around like a “headless chicken”.
For many, the fire is almost extinguished and we forget who we are and to what we are called. And through forgetting, we lose confidence, so that the task of mission, when we look at it seems over whelming, impossible, out of range. [3]
To tackle this inertia we need to remember that the apostolic call is practical – it is “to go”, to go to those on the outside and bring them in. This means putting into place structures within the parish situation where people including the leaders are allowed and equipped to go and “do mission”. This is what the church is designed for: to be a missionary community continually reaching beyond its walls.
For this to happen, people need to encounter the God of mission, these encounters are essential for the churches and the individuals who are participating in God’s mission in the world.
Returning to those whom I have had the privilege of meeting and getting to know on other continents, the sense of being “for the other” has been a massive part of their calling. The movement from self to the other is at the heart of mission. The perfect example of this movement was seen in the life of Jesus.
“The journey that Jesus made from the baptism to the cross, was marked by joy, energy, clarity of focus, friendship, conflict, struggle, the adulation of crowds, powerful preaching and encounters with evil, including structural evil, and the great battle of Gethsemane and Calvary.”[4]
The mission to which Jesus was called is the same to which we are and also same source of power he was given and was sustained by, is the same as we have access to. It is essential that we realise this when it comes to living our lives generally.
A crucial part of going, perhaps the essential part, is from a place of knowing from where we are starting (it is the well known saying – “if I was going there I wouldn’t start from here”). Jesus began his ministry from a particular place, a place of knowing who he was, a question of identity – for Jesus, this was at his baptism “This is my beloved son – with him I am well pleased”[5] . The same has to be true for the believer wishing to participate in the universal mission described above, we need to realise that the spirituality has to begin in a place where they know themselves to be loved by God, where their identity is found solely in Him.
It is from this place of belonging with God (abiding) which all mission proceeds … it is the key to joyful, effective and resilient mission.[6]
As Christians we are not called to simply abide with God, but are also called to be his disciples who learn from the place of abiding but also to go. We are relational beings, beings that were created for relationship with God and with each other. Our relationship with God has to be the foundation of our mission – within all relationships there has to be a degree of trust.
This trust can be a problem in our society – there is a considerable lack of trust in business life, of systems of government. However our mission, our spirituality has to come from a place of trust, a place of confidence, not in dogmatic certainties but daring to believe that in the face of many things that might suggest otherwise, God is good, faithful, just, true and knowable[7]. It is the responsibility of those involved in mission to begin the conversations about the God who is real and at work in his world. Of course, stepping out on this journey of joining with God is a very scary place to be – it is steeped with all the ‘what-if’ questions. These are natural, the feeling of inadequacy is there but it is to be continually remembered that this is where the reliance on the sufficiency of God comes into its own.
To quote Jullian of Norwich
He did not say, ‘You shall not be tempest tossed, you shall not be work-weary, you shall not be discomforted’. But he said, ‘You shall not be over come’.[8]
Within the gospels, we find the Apostles sent out with nothing, no bag, no extra tunic, dependant upon God for everything. Throughout my (however limited) experience of the world church, those who had the little also had the most. This paradoxical statement is in line with “Let the poor say I am rich, let the weak say I am strong”. Taking nothing can be a very difficult concept in our mindset, setting everything aside – physically this is material things, but it is also a call within the mission context to:
“travel light in terms of preoccupations about what may be discovered ‘out there’…going in a spirit of listening – listening to those to who, the journey is made but also listening to the Holy Spirit’s answer as we ask ‘what is needed here? What am I being required to do here? Is it a word of encouragement, Is it an offer of a meal?, a cup of water?, or maybe they have something to give us?[9].
This spirituality of mission, this mutual dependence upon the other, this listening to the Holy Spirit has to be key to the partnership of mission.
The church is a community which acts as a (or even “the”) sign which points towards the
Certainly this is true in today’s world, people are crying out for authentic community. An example of this is the growth of on-line communities where people can communicate and become friends with people who have the similar hobbies etc. The church has come under criticism over past decades about being out of touch with the prevailing culture of society. However if we get this strand of our life towards God right, these relationships with real people in real community right then the mission will certainly move forward. It is the old adage – “people don’t care how much you know until they know how much you care”.
This is where Susan Hope stresses the need for adequate structures in place at a leadership level:
A staff team that begins to try to live out the values of community (commitment, trust, reality) will discover that the power of that common life ripples out into the whole church. If there is confidentiality, respect and commitment at the centre, similar values and ways of relating are much more likely to grow in the community as a whole.
In today’s busy world, we need to realise the importance of rhythm within lifestyle. A possible structure of this is: Sowing and watching, reaping with energy, keeping – folding people in and building up the community.
Life in the Western world at the beginning of the 21st Century militates against the secret of a structure upon ourselves, but people of prayer have discovered that as they start living rhythmically they begin to be connected to something that can be life-renewing to them. This is one of great strengths of the liturgical calendar. [10]
It however, goes further than this – it means knowing when it is OK to say ‘no’, when to spend time with the priorities of the time – whether that be switching off our phones, discovering the things which make peace for us. Hope also comments that other rhythms need balancing.
As one realises the limitations of this particular piece of work, made by the necessary word limit we come to the final word.
The missionary task is one of proclamation – not conversion – that is where the responsibility ends, it is of course not about leaving, but it is being relaxed about outcomes
True Spirituality in mission depends on the maintenance of a proper balance between God’s sovereignty and all embracing redemptive purpose and our human responsibility. [12]
In conclusion, we have spoken about the practicalities of this mission shaped spirituality, we have visited the joys and acknowledged that there will be problems. I do believe that if we are to take this invitation to mission seriously we need to be in for the long haul and as such this spirituality has a two pronged approach linked with joy. We are to be both joyfully serious and seriously joyful. When I read the paragraph – which is contained in the foot note[13] it is extremely freeing to notice that it is all about God.
Let is conclude with a very freeing message – We may die for the mission, but we are not to live for it – we are to live only for God[14]. Amen
Bibliography
Hope, Sue. Mission-shaped Spirituality. London: Church House, 2006.
Mission-Shaped Church. Mission and public affairs. London: Church House, 2004.
[1] Definition of Spirituality By Susan Hope found in Hope, Mission-shaped spirituality, xii
[2] Mission-Shaped Church, 85
[3] Hope, Mission-shaped spirituality, 7
[4] Ibid., 15
[5] Luke 3: 22
[6] Ibid., 17
[7] Ibid., 18
[8] Members of the Jullian Shrine, Enfolded in Love: Daily readings with Juian of Norwich , 1980, quoted in Ibid., 20
[9] Ibid., 47
[10] Ibid., 99
[11] Ibid., 100
[12] Ibid., 101
[13] “There is a kind of relaxed maturity about the mission, a sense of well being, a lightheartedness about the whole enterprise. We are to be both joyfully serious and seriously joyful about the task. At the heart of this is surely a particular humility: a humility that recognizes that the outcome of the mission is God’s not ours, that there is always much to learn and that the relationship of trust and dependence must constantly be attended to.” Ibid. 107,
[14] Ibid., 107
No comments:
Post a Comment